(SS) Duron v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20221:21-cv-00149California255 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 6 REYNALDA DURON, CASE NO.: 1:21-cv-00149-GSA

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

RESPONSE BRIEF

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting Commissioner of Social Security, 11 Defendant. 13 The parties stipulate to a 45-day extension of time from April 25, 2022 to June 9, 2022 for Defendant to file a response brief due to counsel’s workload. This is Defendant’s first extension. When considering whether good cause exists to modify a scheduling order, courts consider the foreseeability of the impediment to meeting the deadline and the party’s diligence in seeking the extension once it became apparent they could not meet the deadline. See Sharp v. Covenant Care LLC, 288 F.R.D. 465, 467 (S.D. Cal. 2012); Ordaz Gonzalez v. Cty. of Fresno, No. 1:18-CV-01558-BAM, 2020 WL 2539287, at *2 (E.D. Cal. May 19, 2020). The Court has the inherent power to manage its own docket to achieve an orderly and expeditious resolution of cases. Southern California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.