Zavala

Zavala v. Reigosa

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20221:21-cv-01631California618 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO ZAVALA, Case No. 1:21-cv-01631 JLT SKO Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS

v. CASE BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM AND DENYING

SALVADOR REIGOSA, et al., PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Defendants. (Docs. 9, 10) 16 Antonio Zavala is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action, which he initiated by filing a complaint on November 8, 2021. (Doc. 1). On February 11, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff did not state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 7 at 6-8.) The magistrate judge informed Plaintiff that he “may file an amended complaint if he believes that additional true factual allegations would state cognizable claims” or “choose to stand on his complaint….” (Id. at 9.) On February 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed a response to the screening order and notified the Court that he wished to stand on the complaint. (Doc. 8 at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.