(PC) Stuckey v. Nestle Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE KENNETH STUCKEY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00511-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
v. (Doc. 35) NESTLE CORPORATION, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
FOURTH MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
Defendants. TIME TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED
COMPLAINT
18 On October 14, 2021, the Court issued a second screening order finding that Plaintiff’s third amended complaint fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Doc. 27.) The Court directed Plaintiff to file a fourth amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading or a notice of voluntary dismissal within 21 days (Id. at 9.) Plaintiff has since been granted three extensions of time within to file his fourth amended complaint. (Docs. 30, 32, 34.) On March 31, 2022, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Nunc Pro Tunc Order to Stay this Case Pending the Plaintiff’s Upcoming Release.” (Doc. 35.) The Court will deny the motion and…