Ramirez

Ramirez v. Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20222:21-cv-01017California3,093 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLAUDIA RAMIREZ, ESMERALDA No. 2:21-cv-01017-MCE-JDP

LIZBETH MENDEZ LOZANO, LILIAN

CABRERA, ANA ROSA MENDOZA,

ALICIA FERNANDEZ, DULCE NIETO,

ROSA HERNANDEZ, individually, and MEMORANDUM AND ORDER on behalf of the general public similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CORNERSTONE BUILDING BRANDS, an unknown business entity; PLY GEM WINDOWS, an unknown business entity; PLY GEM PACIFIC WINDOWS CORPORATION, an unknown business entity; PLY GEM RESIDENTIAL SOLUTIONS, an unknown business entity; SIMONTON DOORS & WINDOWS, an unknown business entity; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 24 The seven named Plaintiffs in this lawsuit were employed on an hourly, non- exempt basis by Defendant Ply Gem Pacific Windows Corporation, a manufacturer of home exterior products, in its West Sacramento, California facility. Plaintiffs initiated the present class action in the Sacramento County Superior Court on April 12, 2021, asserting various wage-and-hour…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.