Vasquez

(PC) Cortinas v. Vasquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20221:19-cv-00367California2,263 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00367-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY (Doc. 98) VASQUEZ, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER DENYING MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF BY PLAINTIFF (Doc. 99) 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is scheduled for an evidentiary hearing on April 19, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. (Doc. 84.) The evidentiary hearing involves “material disputes of fact … regarding whether administrative remedies were available to Plaintiff … [and] an evidentiary hearing is necessary to resolve the disputes.” (Doc. 72.) On April 1, 2022, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Compel Discovery for April 19, 2022 Evidentiary Hearing Scheduled for April 19 2022 at 10:30 A.M. [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37].” (Doc. 98.) On that same date, Plaintiff filed a “Request for Specific…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.