Torres

(PC) Bradford v. Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20222:21-cv-02296California325 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:21-cv-2296 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. TORRES, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, sustained three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Bradford v. German, No 1:15-cv-1511 LJO BAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2015). The undersigned recommended that plaintiff’s motion for in forma pauperis status be denied, and plaintiff be required to pay the court’s filing fee in full. (ECF No. 4.) By an order filed February 10, 2022, the district court adopted the recommendations and ordered plaintiff to pay, within fourteen days, the appropriate filing fee. On March 16, 2022, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration was denied. Fourteen days from March 16, 2022, have now passed, and plaintiff has not paid the court’s filing fee. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. //// ] …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.