Corpuz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELISSA FAIRFIELD, Case No. 1:19-cv-632-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS

TO APPOINT COUNSEL

v. (Doc. Nos. 91, 92, 93) ALBERT KHOO, ET. AL., Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions to appoint counsel, filed on January 25 and February 18, 2022, respectively. (Doc. Nos. 91, 92). Plaintiff also filed a motion titled “Plaintiff’s inaccessibility to the Court” on March 7, 2022, in which Plaintiff suspects his1 previous motions have not been received and reiterates reasons why counsel should be appointed. (Doc. No. 93). The Court thus considers this pleading as a third motion for appointment of counsel. The Court has previously denied Plaintiff’s earlier motion for appointment of counsel. (Doc. No. 69). In each of the motions, Plaintiff requests appointment of counsel for a litany of reasons, including he is not a “jail house lawyer,” lack of education, limited legal experience, limited 26 …