Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20221:21-cv-01461California396 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADAM JAY STONE, ) Case No. 1:21-cv-01461-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

DEFENDANTS AND CLAIMS

) C. PFIEFFER, )

Defendant. ) ) )

Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on September 30, 2021, and Plaintiff paid the filing fee on December 17, 2021. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on January 10, 2022. (ECF No. 22.) On March 23, 2022, the Court screened the first amended complaint, found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable excessive force claim against Defendants Anderson, B. Gonzales, G. Morales, and K. Gonzales, and granted Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed only on the excessive force claim. (ECF No. 26.) On April 4, 2022, Plaintiff filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.