Lizarraga

(PC) Maldonado v. Lizarraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20222:19-cv-02176California1,796 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY RAY SHANEE MALDONADO, No. 2:19-CV-2176-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. See ECF No. 17. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court must screen complaints from prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). A complaint must contain a short and plain statement of the claim that a plaintiff is entitled to relief. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). The complaint must provide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.