D'Agostini

(HC) Craig v. D'Agostini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20222:21-cv-01885California702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, Case No. 2:21-cv-01885-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO RULE ON

v. THESE FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

D’AGOSTINI,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Respondent. THAT THE AMENDED PETITION BE

DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

14 ECF No. 6 15 Petitioner, proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Previously, after reviewing his initial petition, I found that its claims implicated ongoing state criminal proceedings and thus were inappropriate for federal habeas review. ECF No. 5. I gave petitioner an opportunity to amend and explain why his claims ought to proceed. Id. Petitioner filed an amended petition, which, for the reasons stated below, does not save his claims. The amended petition is before me for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, the judge assigned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.