Castillo

(PC) Martin v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20221:22-cv-00002California1,359 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JARED ANDREW MARTIN, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00002-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER BE

D. CASTILLO, et al., ) DENIED ) Defendants. ) ) (ECF 20.) ) ) )

Plaintiff Jared Andrew Martin is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before is Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order, filed April 4, 2022. I. LEGAL STANDARD Procedurally, a federal district court may issue emergency injunctive relief only if it has personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit. See Murphy Bros., Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 350 (1999) (noting that one “becomes a party…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.