(PC) Miller v. Bradford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIJAH LEE MILLER, No. 2:21-cv-2000 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

RAYMOND BRADFORD, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed January 20, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On February 8, 2022, plaintiff was informed that the filing of the notice of amendment form, standing alone, was insufficient, and was reminded that his amended complaint was due February 20, 2022. (ECF No. 12.) On February 24, 2022, the order was re-served on plaintiff. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

The order was re-served based on a change of address plaintiff filed in case no. 2:21-cv-1700 26 KJN. …