(PC) Rodriguez v. Solano State Prison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:21-cv-00622 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WARDEN, SOLANO STATE PRISON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants were deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious medical needs in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for screening. (ECF No. 19.) For the reasons set forth below, the FAC will be dismissed with leave to amend. //// //// //// //// //// //// //// SCREENING I. Legal Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims 6…