Soleimani
(PC) Potts v. Soleimani
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES E. POTTS, No. 1:19-cv-01574-DAD-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART
M. SOLEIMANI, et al., (Doc. No. 22) Defendants.
16 Plaintiff James E. Potts is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On October 21, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this case be dismissed without leave to amend due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim or, in the alternative, that plaintiff’s claims brought against defendants Dr. A. Youssef and Dr. M. Rizk be dismissed without leave to amend due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim, and that plaintiff’s claims brought against defendant Dr. Jim Bentley be transferred to the Sacramento venue within the Eastern District Of California. (Doc. 26…