Carnero

Carnero v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20221:22-cv-00354California1,249 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAY CARNERO, No. 1:22-cv-00354-DAD-SKO Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUA SPONTE DISMISSING ACTION

DUE TO LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS JURISDICTION

CORPORATION,

15 Defendant.

17 On March 25, 2022, defendant removed this action from the Fresno County Superior Court to this federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441, and 1446. (Doc. No. 1.) Four days later, on March 29, 2022, defendant filed a motion to stay these proceedings “pending the outcome of mediation,” or alternatively, to extend the time for defendant to file a response to the complaint by 60 days. (Doc. No. 5 at 2.) In defendant’s motion to stay, it states that plaintiff e-filed and served on defendant a request for dismissal of the complaint without prejudice in Fresno County Superior Court on March 25, 2022—the very same day defendant removed this action to this federal court. (Id.) Defendant admits that the request for dismissal was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.