(PC) Sharp v. Board of Supervisors (Fresno)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY ANDRE SHARP, Case No. 1:22-cv-00012-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (FRESNO), (Doc. No. 2)

ET. AL.,

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Anthony Andre Sharp, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP motion”). (Doc. No. 2). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the district court deny Plaintiff’s IFP motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff has at least three dismissals that constitute strikes and the complaint does not establish Plaintiff meets the imminent danger exception. Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee if he wishes to proceed with a civil action. BACKGROUND AND FACTS…