Quick

(PC) Jackson v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20221:19-cv-01591California674 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01591-JLT-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 JASON QUICK, et al., (ECF No. 107) 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Cornel Jackson is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s claims in his second amended complaint against (1) Defendants Jason Quick, Elizabeth Alvarez, A. Rossette, Lt. Followell, Lisette Lopez, Dominic Ramos, Kasandra Sanchez, Hermina Marley, and C. Prudente for violating Plaintiff’s First and Sixth Amendment rights with respect to Plaintiff’s legal correspondence and for conspiracies to violate such rights and (2) Defendant Elizabeth Alvarez for violating Plaintiff’s right of access to the courts. (ECF No. 30). This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for leave to file a first amended answer to Plaintiff’s second 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.