(PC) Seymour v. Wasco State Prison Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20221:21-cv-01485California1,938 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AARON D. SEYMOUR, Case No. 1:21-cv-01485-AWI-EPG (PC)

10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT HIS COMPLAINT BE DENIED DOE 1, et al., 13 (ECF No. 28) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

15 Aaron D. Seymour (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. On April 4, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to supplement his complaint to add a retaliation claim against Lt. Ledbetter. (ECF No. 28). For the reasons that follow, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff’s motion be denied without prejudice to Plaintiff asserting that claim in a separate lawsuit. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his initial complaint on September 24, 2021. This case is currently proceeding on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim against defendants Doe 1, Degough, and Doe 2 based on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.