Ciolli

(PC) Barrett v. Ciolli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20221:20-cv-01802California807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY BARRETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01802-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PRE-

A. CIOLLI, et al., ANSWER MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT ON EXHAUSTION OF

Defendants. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES (ECF No. 48) 17 Plaintiff Anthony Curtis Barrett (“Plaintiff”) is a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics 19 Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 20 On March 28, 2022, Defendants A. Ciolli, Cobbs, C. Hanson, A. Leger, Rodriguez, Scott, 21 and Young (“Defendants”) filed an application requesting: 1) leave to file a pre-answer motion 22 for summary judgment on exhaustion of administrative remedies; 2) leave to take Plaintiff’s 23 deposition on administrative exhaustion issues; and 3) an extension of time to respond to the 24 complaint until after the Court rules on the motion for summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.