Sweet

(HC) Wagner v. Sweet

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20222:21-cv-01689California844 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 WILLIE WAGNER, Case No. 2:21-cv-01689-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER THAT: v. (1) THE CLERK OF COURT ASSIGN A

DISTRICT JUDGE TO RULE ON THESE

NANCY SWEET, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Respondent. (2) THE AMENDED PETITION IS

DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

WITHIN THIRTY DAYS; AND (3) PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS ARE DENIED.

17 ECF Nos. 8, 13, & 14

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE DENIED

20 ECF No. 9 21 22 Petitioner, proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Judge Hollows, who was previously assigned to this case, found that petitioner’s first petition did not state a cognizable claim. ECF No. 6. Petitioner has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.