Harl

(PC) Paulus v. Harl

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20221:21-cv-00094California600 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDDY H. PAULUS II, 1:21-cv-00094-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY

ASSIGN A UNITED STATES DISTRICT

v. JUDGE TO THIS CASE HARL, et al., AND Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANT

BETRAND FOR VIOLATION OF THE

ADA, AND THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS

AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

19 20 21 22 Eddy H. Paulus (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (1994). On January 22, 2022, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint names as defendants Captain F. Harl, Officer Bertrand, Officer Ramero, Olga Beregovskaya (Primary Care Physician), and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.