Sants

Sants v. Seipert

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20222:15-cv-00355California2,639 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Nicholas Sants, No. 2:15-cv-00355-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. Michael Seipert, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 The court conducted a final pretrial conference in this excessive force case on November 19, 2021. See Final Pretrial Order at 1, ECF No. 88. At the final pretrial conference, 19 the parties requested that the court hear five motions in /imine on an advanced briefing and hearing schedule, see Stip., ECF No. 90, and the court did so on March 25, 2022, see Am. Minutes, ECF No. 96. The court denied plaintiff's first motion in imine seeking to preclude defendant from making any reference to his misdemeanor conviction for resisting a peace officer 23 in violation of California Penal Code section 148(a)(1), but agreed that a limiting instruction will 24 be appropriate during trial. /d. The court resolves the four remaining motions in limine here. 25 I. PLAINTIFF’S THIRD…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.