Encinas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE THOMAS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01321-BAK (BAM) (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

ENCINAS, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

17 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding1 pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 12, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Change of Address, providing an address in San Diego, California. (Doc. 8.) On January 6, 2022, the Court issued a Notice of Temporary Magistrate Judge Referral. (Doc. 9.) The notice was served on Plaintiff at his address of record with the Court. (Id.) On January 13, 2022, the notice was returned by the U.S. Postal Service marked undeliverable and unable to forward.

1 II. DISCUSSION A pro se plaintiff must keep the Court and opposing parties informed of his…