Martel

(HC) Williams v. Martel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20222:18-cv-02224California435 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 DAVID EARL WILLIAMS, No. 2:18-cv-02224 KJM DB 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER

MICHAEL MARTEL,

15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Presently before the court is petitioner’s request for reconsideration, motion to appoint counsel, and motion for an evidentiary hearing. (ECF No. 43.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny the request for reconsideration as moot, and deny the motions for evidentiary hearing and to appoint counsel without prejudice. Petitioner seeks reconsideration of a prior order denying his request for additional time and requests that his objections (ECF No. 42) be accepted as timely filed. (ECF No. 43 at 1.) In light of the March 25, 2022, order granting petitioner’s requests for additional time to file objections (ECF No. 41), the court will deny petitioner’s request for reconsideration as moot. Petitioner’s objections shall be deemed timely filed. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.