Salinas v. Nestle Purina PetCare Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20221:21-cv-01140California3,413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

KEVIN E. GAUT (SBN 117352), keg@msk.com EMMA LUEVANO (SBN 198421), eyl@msk.com MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP 2049 Century Park East, 18th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-3120 Telephone: (310) 312-2000 Facsimile: (310) 312-3100

Attorneys for Defendants Nestle Purina PetCare Company and Nestlé USA, Inc.

CAROLYN H. COTTRELL (SBN 166977), ccottrell@schneiderwallace.com ORI EDELSTEIN (SBN 268145), oedelstein@schneiderwallace.com ANDREW WEAVER (SBN 318935), aweaver@schneiderwallace.com PHILIPPE M. GAUDARD (SBN 331744), pgaudard@schneiderwallace.com SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY LLP 2000 Powell St., Suite 1400 Emeryville, CA 94608 Telephone: (415) 421-7100 Facsimile: (415) 421-7105

Attorneys for Plaintiff Emmanuel Salinas, on behalf of the himself and the Class members

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18 EMMANUEL SALINAS, on behalf of himself Case No.: 1:21-CV-01140-JLT-BAK (BAM) and the Class members, Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER v. NESTLÉ PURINA PETCARE COMPANY;

NESTLÉ USA, INC.,

23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 Plaintiff Emmanuel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.