Halliday

Halliday v. Spjute

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20221:07-cv-00620California1,758 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SHELLY J. IOANE, et al., CASE NO. 1:07-CV-00620-AWI-EPG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

v. FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RULING

JEAN NOLL, et al.,

Defendants. (Doc. No. 580)

13 14 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Shelly Ioane’s request for reconsideration (Doc. No. 580) of the Magistrate Judge’s order (Doc. No. 578), which granted Defendant Jean Noll’s motion for a follow-up psychological examination of Plaintiff Ioane pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. No. 565). Legal Standard A district court may refer pretrial issues to a magistrate judge to either hear and decide or issue findings and recommendations. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Khrapunov v. Prosyankin, 931 F.3d 922, 930-31 (9th Cir. 2019); Bhan v.NME Hosp., Inc., 929 F.2d 1404, 1414 (9th Cir. 1991). If a party objects to a non-dispositive pretrial ruling by a magistrate judge, the district court will 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.