(PC) Buckner v. Sacramento County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20222:21-cv-01922California2,002 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LADARRIAN BUCKNER, No. 2:21-cv-1922 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. On December 20, 2021, it was recommended that his action be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with the November 2, 2021 order. On March 17, 2022, plaintiff, who had been transferred to state custody, filed an amended complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore, the findings and recommendations are vacated. Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.