A.L.
A.L. v. County of Stanislaus
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 LEANN SANTOR, No. 1:19-cv-01593-AWI-SKO 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE v. CASES 14 KATHRYN M. HARWELL, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 A.L., a minor by and through her No. 1:21-cv-01732-AWI-SKO 18 guardian ad litem
Korey Santor, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., Defendants.
25 26
28 On April 8, 2022, counsel in the above-captioned cases filed a stipulation seeking to consolidate (1) Leann Santor v. Kathryn M. Harwell, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-01593-AWI-SKO (“Santor”) and (2) A.L. v. County of Stanislaus, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01732-AWI-SKO (“A.L.”). (Santor, Doc. 63; A.L., Doc. 13.) Pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[i]f actions before the court involve a common question of law or fact, the court may: (1) join for hearing or trial any or all matters at issue in the actions; (2) consolidate the actions; or (3) issue any…