Gastelum
Gastelum v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:21-cv-01740-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
v. (Doc. 13) KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES INC. dba KOHL’S, 15 Defendants 16 Currently pending before the Court is a motion to amend the complaint filed by Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum (“Plaintiff”) on March 28, 2022. (Doc. 13.) Defendant Kohl’s, Inc., erroneously named as Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc. dba Kohl’s (“Defendant”), filed a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint. (Doc. 18.) The motion to amend was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge for appropriate action. (Doc. 16.) Based on the absence of opposition, the matter is deemed submitted on the record without the need for oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). Having considered the unopposed motion and the record in this case, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend will be GRANTED. BACKGROUND On…