Robert Miska v. Engineering Automation & Design, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT MISKA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01183-AWI-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
v.
ENGINEERING AUTOMATION & DESIGN, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Currently pending before the Court is the Joint Motion and Motion for Approval of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Robert Miska and Defendants Smith Seckman Reid, Inc. (“SSR”) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (“Conagra”) filed a. (Doc. 36.) The motion was referred to the undersigned for findings and recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72. (Doc. 37.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court will require additional briefing on the motion for settlement approval. Background On July 14, 2020, Plaintiff initiated this action in Stanislaus Superior Court against Defendants Engineering Automation & Design, Inc. dba EAD Management Services, Inc. (“EAD”), SSR and Conagra. Plaintiff alleged violations of the California Labor Code and…