(PC) Bucaojit v. Solano County Sheriff's Department

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW MICHAEL BUCAOJIT, Case No. 2:19-cv-02055-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES

SOLANO COUNTY, et al., ECF No. 39 Defendants.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS 17 On January 10, 2022, defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s third amended 18 complaint. ECF No. 39. To date, plaintiff has not filed a response. 19 In cases where a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party 20 is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition not more twenty-one days after the 21 motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no 22 opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may 23 result in the imposition of sanctions.” Id. 24 To manage its docket effectively, the court…