Baughman

(PC) Rodriguez v. Baughman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20222:18-cv-00655California845 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN GARCIA RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:18-cv-00655-MCE-CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 30, 2021, defendant Friend filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 71. Plaintiff did not file an opposition. The court previously advised plaintiff of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See ECF No. 18 at 3 (citing Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998)(en banc); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988)). On March 4, 2022, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of non- opposition to the pending motion within thirty days. ECF No. 73. In the same order, plaintiff was informed that failure to file an opposition would result in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.