Emino

(PS) Abed v. Emino

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20222:21-cv-01152California1,346 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALI ABED, Case No. 2:21-cv-01152-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. ECF No. 2 HEATHER EMINO, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

Defendant. DISMISS THIS CASE AS FRIVOLOUS AND

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

16 ECF No. 1

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS

18 ORDER Plaintiff moves to proceed without prepayment of filing fees, ECF No. 2, and his affidavit satisfies the requirements to proceed in such manner, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The motion, ECF No. 2, is therefore granted. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This complaint is subject to screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff names as defendants Heather Emino, Ruthanne Edginton, James Oakley, and “the rogue State of California.” ECF No. 1 at 2-3. He brings this complaint as an attempt to revive a lawsuit that he filed in 2018. See ECF No. 1 at 5. In Abed v. Amino,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.