Emino
(PS) Abed v. Emino
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALI ABED, Case No. 2:21-cv-01152-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
v. ECF No. 2 HEATHER EMINO, et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
Defendant. DISMISS THIS CASE AS FRIVOLOUS AND
FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
16 ECF No. 1
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS
18 ORDER Plaintiff moves to proceed without prepayment of filing fees, ECF No. 2, and his affidavit satisfies the requirements to proceed in such manner, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The motion, ECF No. 2, is therefore granted. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This complaint is subject to screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff names as defendants Heather Emino, Ruthanne Edginton, James Oakley, and “the rogue State of California.” ECF No. 1 at 2-3. He brings this complaint as an attempt to revive a lawsuit that he filed in 2018. See ECF No. 1 at 5. In Abed v. Amino,…