Lua

(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Lua

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20222:21-cv-01452California616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, Case No. 2:21-cv-01452-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. ECF No. 1 TERESA LUA, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS TO PROCEED IN FORMA

Defendants. PAUPERIS ECF Nos. 2, 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS

19 ORDER Plaintiff moves to proceed without prepayment of filing fees. ECF Nos. 2, 5. Plaintiff’s affidavit satisfies the requirements to proceed in such manner. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Thus, the motions, ECF Nos. 2 & 5, are granted. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having granted plaintiff’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis, the first amended complaint is now subject to screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must dismiss any action filed in forma pauperis that is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.