Tingley

(PC) Oliver v. Tingley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20221:22-cv-00071California3,433 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY LADEL OLIVER, Case No. 1:22-cv-0071-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

LT. J. TINGLEY, et al., REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION Defendants. (ECF No. 10)

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Anthony Oliver (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on January 19, 2022, was screened and Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on March 28, 2022, is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 10.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.