(PC) Roberts v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20221:22-cv-00131California2,376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ROBERTS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00131-HBK Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (Doc No. 2) AND REHABILITATION, KERN

VALLEY STATE PRISON, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON-

CORCORAN, ORDER TO ASSIGN TO DISTRICT JUDGE

17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff David Roberts—a state prisoner—initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Sacramento Division of the Court December 22, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). The case was transferred to this Court on February 1, 2022. (Doc. No. 7). Pending is Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP motion”). (Doc. No. 2). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the district court deny Plaintiff’s IFP motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.