(PC)Ruiz

(PC)Ruiz v. Stane

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20221:22-cv-00236California1,378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-236-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING CASE BE DISMISSED

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

M STANE, M. ESPINOZA, E. RUELAS, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

D. CHAVEZ, D. ROWLAND,

ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE Defendants. (Doc. No. 6) 17 I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND Plaintiff Rogelio May Ruiz—a state prisoner—proceeds pro se on a prisoner civil rights complaint filed in the Sacramento Division of this Court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 22, 2022. (Doc. No. 1). On February 25, 2022, the case was transferred to his Division. (Doc. No. 4). On February 28, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either pay the requisite filing fee or file the enclosed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. (Doc. No. 6). The order warned Plaintiff that if he “fails to timely comply with this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.