Ciolli
(PC) Barrett v. Ciolli
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY BARRETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01802-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
A. CIOLLI, et al., JUDGMENT ON EXHAUSTION OF
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
Defendants. (ECF No. 54) 16 Plaintiff Anthony Curtis Barrett (“Plaintiff”) is a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On March 28, 2022, Defendants A. Ciolli, Cobbs, C. Hanson, A. Leger, Rodriguez, Scott, and Young (“Defendants”) filed an application requesting leave to file a pre-answer motion for summary judgment on exhaustion of administrative remedies. (ECF No. 48.) On March 29, 2022, the Court entered an order directing Plaintiff to file a response to the application. (ECF No. 49.) Plaintiff filed a motion on April 4, 2022, which, among other things, included a response to 25 …