Chastaine

(PS) Serris v. Chastaine

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20222:22-cv-00434California3,583 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILL JOSEPH SERRIS, No. 2:22-cv-0434-JAM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SHAUNA CHASTAINE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Bill Joseph Serris proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with a complaint asserting claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), civil rights conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. § 1985, and state- law claims. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s complaint filed 22 on March 8, 2022 (ECF No. 1) is before the court for screening.1 I. Screening and Pleading Standards Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must screen every in forma pauperis proceeding, and must order dismissal of the case if it is

1 At plaintiff’s request (ECF No. 1 at 27), the court uses a 16-point font for this order. “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief against a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.