Unknown

(PC) Bonderer v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20222:20-cv-02540California902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEREMY KENNETH BONDERER, No. 2:20-cv-2540 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNKNOWN,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On screening the court found that though the complaint in this case stated cognizable claims for relief, it could not be served because plaintiff had named only Doe defendants. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff was given sixty days to identify the Doe defendants and advised that he should “promptly seek such information through the California Public Records Act, Calif. Gov’t. Code § 6250, et seq., or other means available to plaintiff,” including the jail grievance system or other administrative process. Id. at 4-5 & n.2. He was further advised that “[i]f access to the required information is denied or unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may seek judicial intervention.” Id. at 4. Plaintiff was warned that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.