(HC) Pierce v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20221:22-cv-00107California1,967 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT MATTHEW PIERCE, No. 1:22-cv-00107-HBK Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS AMENDED PETITION FOR

v. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND

FAILURE TO EXHAUST

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES1 Respondent. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD (Doc. No. 16) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

19 Petitioner Scott Matthew Pierce (“Petitioner”), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, 20 initiated this case on December 13, 20221 by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 21 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. No. 1). A preliminary screening of the petition revealed that Petitioner 22 failed to present any cognizable grounds for relief or any facts in support and failed to name a 23 proper respondent. The undersigned granted leave to amend the petition on January 31, 2022, 24 and Petitioner submitted a first amended petition on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.