(PC) Witt v. Trinity Feeding

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY JAMAL WITT, No. 2:21-cv-2229 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND TRINITY FEEDING, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants.

17 By order filed March 9, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to 18 file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has 19 not filed an amended complaint. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 21 court judge to this case; and 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 26 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 27 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate…