(HC) Martin v. People of the State of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VERDELL MARTIN, No. 2:21-cv-2121 CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA,

15 Respondents. 16 By order filed March 1, 2022, petitioner’s habeas application was dismissed and thirty days’ leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court and serve…