Santiago

(PC) Arzaga v. Santiago

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20222:18-cv-00313California331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL JESUS ARZAGA, No. 2:18-cv-0313 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS E. SANTIAGO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. He paid the filing fee. On January 19, 2022, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, why defendant Santiago should not be dismissed, and cautioned that failure to respond would result in a recommendation that defendant Santiago be dismissed from this action without prejudice. (ECF No. 110.) The thirty-day period expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Santiago be dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). ////

Plaintiff sought and was granted extensions of time to oppose the pending motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by defendants Pak and Gisler. (ECF Nos. 111, 112,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.