Martindale

Martindale v. MegaStar Financial Corp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20222:20-cv-01983California2,829 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURIE MARTINDALE, on behalf of No. 2:20-cv-01983-MCE-DMC herself and all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v.

MEGASTAR FINANCIAL

CORPORATION, Defendant. 17 Through the present action, Plaintiff Laurie Martindale (“Plaintiff”) asserts both individual and class claims against Defendant MegaStar Financial Corporation (“Defendant”) for violation of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, California Civil Code §§ 1788 et seq. (“Rosenthal Act”); violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, California Business and Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. (“UCL”); and breach of contract. First Amended Compl., ECF No. 11 (“FAC”). Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s FAC for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). ECF No. 23 (“Def.’s Mot.”). This matter /// ///

1 All further references to “Rule” or “Rules” are to the Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.