Quick

(PC) Jackson v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20221:19-cv-01591California710 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01591-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THE CASE AGAINST

v. DEFENDANT KASANDRA SANCHEZ

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE JASON QUICK, et al., TO COMPLETE SERVICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL Defendants. PROCEDURE 4(m) 15

Plaintiff Cornel Jackson is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 17 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons given below, the Court 18 orders Plaintiff to show cause why the case against Defendant Kasandra Sanchez should not be 19 dismissed without prejudice for failure to complete service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 20 Procedure 4(m). 21 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), “[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days 22 after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.