(PC) Miller v. Mule Creek State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20222:22-cv-00599California775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHAIS MILLER, No. 2:22-cv-0599 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. As best this court can tell, in his complaint filed April 5, 2022, plaintiff alleges that he has been unable to get his property since he was transferred to Mule Creek State Prison on March 12, 2022. He appears to also allege he has been subject to retaliation. Plaintiff admits that he has not fully exhausted his claims by presenting them to the highest level of administrative review. (ECF No. 1 at 3, 4.) Plaintiff states that he has not fully exhausted because this suit involves an “emergency mental health issue.” For relief, plaintiff asks for the “retaliation to stop,” for proper mental health care, for immediate return of his property, and for nominal damages. SCREENING The court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.