Mayes
(PC) Vaden v. Mayes
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST LEE VADEN, JR., No. 2:19-cv-2216 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROBERT L. MAYES, et al., Defendants. 16 On February 1, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s January 10, 2022 order denying as untimely plaintiff’s motion seeking leave to depose non-parties by written questions pursuant to Rule 31 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court may reconsider a ruling under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). “Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed ///// 24 In the February 1, 2022 motion, plaintiff also seeks reconsideration of the court’s January 13, 25 2022 denial of plaintiff’s motion to serve additional interrogatories upon defendant Mayes. In an order issued February 8, 2022, the court did grant…