Klinge
(PC) Taylor v. Klinge
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, No. 2:21-cv-01128 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
JILL KLINGE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process by presenting false evidence and testimony at plaintiff’s trial and failing to correct it. Before the court is plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 6) and plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed with prejudice. The court will order plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis denied as moot. //// //// //// //// SCREENING I. Legal Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief…