(PC) Suarez v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20221:22-cv-00160California442 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ALFREDO SUAREZ, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00160-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

KEN CLARK, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN ) DEFENDANTS AND CLAIMS ) ) (ECF No. 13) )

Plaintiff Jose Alfredo Suarez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 25, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and found that he stated a cognizable excessive force claim against Defendant O. Valladolid, a cognizable failure to intervene claim against Defendants B. Camargo, Gamboa, and John Doe No. 4, and a cognizable retaliation claim against Defendant Gamboa. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff was granted the opportunity to file an amended complaint or notify the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.